The practice is predominantly an American concept, but it has also been seen in other countries including the United Kingdom, Canada, India, and Russia. For example, a document sponsored by the International Association of Chiefs of Police states that the use of a recording device alone is not grounds for arrest, unless other laws are violated. Such events have prompted police officials to release information on the proper methods of handling such an activity. Auditors have been detained, arrested, assaulted, had camera equipment confiscated, weapons aimed at them, their homes raided by a SWAT team, and have been shot while video recording in a public place. Īuditors tend to film or photograph government buildings, equipment, access control points, and sensitive areas, as well as any law enforcement or military personnel present. Some auditors have also been known to enter public buildings asserting that they have a legal right to openly carry firearms (a right covered by the second amendment, not the first), leading to accusations that auditors are engaged in intimidation, terrorism, and/or the sovereign citizen movement. Critics argue that audits are often confrontational in nature, as auditors often refuse to self-identify or explain their activities. Auditors believe that the movement promotes transparency and open government. It is often categorized by its practitioners, known as auditors, as activism and citizen journalism that tests constitutional rights, in particular the right to photograph and video record in a public space (a right normally covered by the fourth amendment). Thumbnail of a First Amendment audit video on YouTubeįirst Amendment audits are a largely American social movement that usually involves photographing or filming from a public space.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |